Introducing: Pretty Chat • Chat with any website without switching tabs.

    Write better prompts that ship faster code

    Vague prompts give you code that almost works. Pretty Prompt turns your rough ask into a clear, detailed spec for ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, or any AI coding tool, so you spend less time re-prompting and more time shipping.

    ⭐ 4.9 from 130+ ratings · 40,000+ users

    Try the Prompt Optimizer

    Why your coding prompts miss

    When you ask an AI to "fix this bug" or "build a login page," it fills the gaps with guesses. It picks a framework you don't use, skips your error handling, or rewrites files you didn't want touched.

    The fix is to give it a real spec: the stack, the constraints, the files in play, the edge cases, and the exact output you expect. Doing that by hand for every prompt is slow, so most people fire off a one-liner and then argue with the model for ten minutes.

    Pretty Prompt writes the spec for you. Type what you want, click once, and get a prompt that spells out context, requirements, and format, so the AI gets it right the first time.

    How it works

    Step 1

    Write your rough prompt

    Describe the task in plain language, in Cursor, Claude, ChatGPT, or any AI coding tool.

    Step 2

    Click to optimize

    Pretty Prompt rewrites it into a precise prompt, adding stack, constraints, edge cases, and the output format you want.

    Step 3

    Get working code

    Send the improved prompt and get code that needs far less back-and-forth.

    Pretty Prompt works as a web app, a Chrome extension, and an MCP server, so it plugs into the tools you already build in.

    Built for every kind of coding task

    New features

    Turn a one-line ask into a prompt that names the stack, files, and acceptance criteria.

    Debugging

    Prompts that give the AI the error, the context, and what "fixed" actually means.

    Refactoring

    Tell the AI exactly what to change and what to leave alone.

    Tests

    Prompts that specify framework, coverage, and edge cases.

    Code review

    Structured prompts that catch what a quick skim misses.

    Docs & commits

    Clear prompts for READMEs, comments, and commit messages that read well.

    Pretty Prompt vs. prompting code by hand

    Best for

    Pretty Prompt

    Turning a rough ask into a full spec, instantly

    Prompting manually

    When you already know the exact spec

    Copy-paste prompt libraries

    Fixed tasks that match a template

    Adds stack, constraints, edge cases

    Pretty Prompt

    Yes, automatically

    Prompting manually

    Depends on your prompting skill

    Copy-paste prompt libraries

    Only what the template hard-codes

    Works where you code

    Pretty Prompt

    Yes, in the browser and via MCP

    Prompting manually

    N/A

    Copy-paste prompt libraries

    Manual copy-paste every time

    Adapts to your specific task

    Pretty Prompt

    Yes, rewrites your words

    Prompting manually

    Yes, if you do the work

    Copy-paste prompt libraries

    No, one-size-fits-all

    Time to a better prompt

    Pretty Prompt

    Seconds, one click

    Prompting manually

    Minutes of trial and error

    Copy-paste prompt libraries

    Minutes of hunting for the right one

    Pair it with the Prompt Playground to compare how Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini each handle your improved prompt.

    Coding prompts FAQ

    Trusted by 40,000+ AI users

    4.9 / 5on Chrome Web Store(130+ reviews)

    read the reviews

    Stop re-prompting. Start shipping.

    Turn any rough ask into a spec that gets you working code, in one click, right where you build.

    ⭐ 4.9 · 40,000+ users

    ?